Benjamin Zander’s Art of Possibility has filled me with enthusiasm and new vision for being a quality leader. He has this to say in Chapter 10: “We often use reward and punishment to regulate accountability – the carrot and the stick… Apportioning blame works well enough to keep order in a relatively homogeneous society that boasts commonly accepted values and where everyone is enrolled in playing his part. It appeals to our instinctive sense of fairness. However, its effectiveness is likely to be circumscribed in communities of divergent cultures and widely varied resources.”
Wow. WOW. So that’s perhaps why I loved living in Japan so much. It was ordered. I knew my role, and we all worked together, “enrolled” in our efforts to support the community and the country by succeeding in our places. America is not homogeneous. Not even close. Were we ever? That’s a good research topic. But, I have strayed. Back to the reading: Instead of being a piece of a game such as chess, Zander says to be the board itself, the “framework for the game of life around you.” (p. 146) Yes! Now being the board gives you the “power to transform your experience of any unwanted condition into one with which you care to live.” Keep in mind he says “your experience and not the condition itself.”
The action of the game, the point is that you now make room for “all the possible moves.”
Think on THAT people.
I replied:
I AM thinking on that! I loved reading this chapter probably more than any others. The idea that instead of wallowing in our own self pity and lamenting the things that happen to us, we assume a position of power where we control the things that happen in and around us, or at least how we respond to them.
I love that you mention how this attitude is pervasive in Japan, but absent from our culture here in America. I think we’re seriously lacking boards in this country and having more people choosing the be them will make a huge difference in our cultures, and our schools
















I often wonder as I'm printing a class set of a newspaper article whether I'm following the letter of the law in reproducing the materials. I think the public is generally misinformed and under-informed when it comes to fair use and copyright issues, and it would be great to see more "Copyright for Dummies" type information out there for us not so savvy folks
6:14 PM
And wow, the whole top half of my comment got left off, awesome.
What I was saying was that I really appreciate your expertise in the field of copyright, and your acknowledgment that many of us, particularly those in education, really don't have a clear understanding of what copyright and fair use is. Most people know the basics like, don't call someone's work your own, and don't reproduce another's whole work without giving them credit/royalties, but the lines get so blurred. Many of the copyright laws specifically refer to print media, and as digital media has and continues to evolve, I think that people will become even more confused on copyright issues.
6:17 PM